| 翻訳と辞書 |
Jus tertii
''Jus tertii'' (Latin, “''third party rights''”) is the legal classification for an argument made by a third party (as opposed to the legal title holder) which attempts to justify entitlement to possessory rights based on the showing of legal title in another person. By showing legitimate title in another person, ''jus tertii'' arguments imply that the present possessor’s interest is illegitimate or that the present possessor is a thief.
Under United States law, ''jus tertii'' arguments are generally insufficient to support actions for replevin because they fail to show that possession is ''more'' legitimate in the third party than in the present possessor.〔See ''Gissel v. State'', 727 P.2d 1153 (Idaho 1986)〕 However, a bailee or other legal agent of the owner may successfully assert the argument.
The principle is sometimes used to allow one person to enforce or test the constitutional rights of another, which usually can't be done due to lack of standing. This is only possible for fundamental rights, where there is a close connection between the person whose rights are violated and the person wishing to enforce them, and the constitutional right being enforced is a fundamental right. See, e.g., ''Singleton v. Wulff'' Et Al., 96 S. Ct. 2868, 428 U.S. 106 (U.S. 1976).
==Hypothetical example==
Art brings an action for replevin against Burt, seeking to recover a bicycle. In support for the action, Art presents evidence that Cathy is in fact the true owner of the bicycle in question, not Burt. A US court would reject Art’s ''jus tertii'' argument for replevin because he has failed to show that he has a more legitimate interest in the bike than does Burt.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Jus tertii」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|